Criterion 2 –TEACHING-LEARNING AND EVALUATION

Metric No. Metric Description Information link
2.1 - Student Enrollment and Profile
2.1.1 - Enrolment Number Number of students admitted during the year
2.1.1.1 Number of students admitted during the year View document
2.1.2 - Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats)
2.1.2.1 Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories during the year View document
2.2 - Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners View document
2.2.2 Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) View document
2.3 - Teaching- Learning Process
2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences View document
2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. Write description in maximum of 200 words View document
2.3.3 - Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )
2.3.3.1 Number of mentors View document
2.4 - Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1 Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year View document
2.4.2 - Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1 Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.C Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year View document
2.4.3 - Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year)
2.4.3.1 Total experience of full-time teachers View document
2.5 - Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Write description within 200 words. View document
2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient View document
2.6 - Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.6.1 Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. View document
2.6.2 Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. View document
2.6.3 - Pass percentage of Students during the year
2.6.3.1 Total number of final year students who passed the university examination during the year View document
2.7 - Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) on overall institutional performance (Institution may design its own questionnaire) (results and details need to be provided as a weblink) View document